B20

Promoting Integrity by Creating Opportunities for Responsible Businesses

Drawn up by the B20 Cross-Thematic Group on Responsible Business Conduct & Anti-Corruption, this policy paper sets out the following recommendations:

Recommendation 1: Establish Beneficial Ownership Transparency – G20 members should increase their efforts to implement beneficial ownership transparency so that risks related to the ultimate owner(s) can be identified.

Recommendation 2: Recognize Compliance Efforts – G20 members should be supportive of a company’s proactive engagement by providing positive recognition of effective anti-corruption and compliance systems.

Recommendation 3: Enhance Responsible Business Conduct in Infrastructure Projects – G20 members should increase transparency and accountability at all stages of the project cycle in order to mitigate the risk of corruption and increase efficiency.

Of particular note is Policy Action 3.3 of Recommendation 3: Support Collective Action

G20 members should promote Collective Action, that are initiatives between different businesses, and between businesses and the public sector, which foster integrity (such as Integrity Pacts and High Level Reporting Mechanisms). G20 should initiate a study that explores joint ways of fighting corruption and misconduct in infrastructure projects.

The fight against corruption is one area that benefits significantly from coordinated efforts exercised as Collective Action. Companies, governments and institutions can come together to mitigate misconduct and combat corruption. B20 has been calling upon G20 members to encourage anti-corruption Collective Action since 2013. B20 facilitates Collective Action initiatives and knowledge-sharing through the B20 Collective Action Hub, which was mandated to the Basel Institute in close partnership with the UN Global Compact in New York in 2013. The platform offers tools and a forum for businesses to take concrete action to jointly step up against corruption and strengthen good business practice. It also pro- vides a space for business and governments to collaborate in this endeavor.

G20 members should support Integrity Pacts (IPs), High Level Reporting Mechanism and other forms of Collective Action (see Exhibit 21,22)70. IPs were developed by TI in 1994 as a tool for promoting integrity in public-sector contracts signaling that the bidder has been selected on the basis of fair criteria and that the execution of the contract is being monitored. They are short-term, project-specific formal agreements between a customer (usually a public entity) and a bidder (usually a company), in which the parties agree to adhere to fairness and transparency and confirm that they will abstain from bribery, collusion and other illicit practices throughout the duration of the contract. IPs include a monitoring system to ensure accountability and also provide for sanctions which may even lead to the exclusion of the company from further invitations to tender.

Published

01/2017 (6 years ago)

Documents

Related publications

Quick guide

Quick Guide 24: Internal controls and anti-corruption

2022 | Basel Institute on Governance

Rebecca Batts
internal controlscorruption risk managementinternal audits

Report

B20 Italy Integrity and Compliance Policy Paper 2021

2021 | B20 Italy

business integrity

Flyer

Flyer: Basel Open Intelligence

2021 | Basel Institute on Governance

Flyer

Flyer: Basel AML Index

2021 | Basel Institute on Governance

Flyer

Flyer: Basel LEARN and free eLearning courses

2021 | Basel Institute on Governance

Report

Key developments in mandatory human rights due diligence and supply chain law: Considerations for employers

2021 | International Organisation of Employers (IoE), Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (KAS)

anti-corruption compliance

Annual report

Annual Report 2020

2021 | Basel Institute on Governance

Guidelines, Report

Make It Count: Understanding the current and emerging trends in measuring the effectiveness of corporate approaches to anti-corruption

2021 | Transparency International

anti-bribery measures

Working paper

Working Paper 34: Local certification through Collective Action: an innovative approach to anti-corruption compliance and due diligence

2021 | Basel Institute on Governance

Vanessa Hans, Scarlet Wannenwetsch, Gemma Aiolfi
certificationdue diligence

Article, Commissioned study, Report

The G20’s responsiveness to B20 anti-corruption recommendations 2010–2017. Part I: Baseline report

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
anti-corruption standards

Report

Transparency in Corporate Reporting: South Africa 2020

2020 | Corruption Watch, ODI and the National Business Initiative

non-financial reporting

Guidelines

Measuring effectiveness of anti-corruption programmes: Indicators for company reporting

2020 | Norges Bank Investment Management

anti-corruption compliance

Report

B20 Saudi Arabia Integrity and Compliance Policy Paper 2020

2020 | B20 Saudi Arabia

business integrity

Flyer

Flyer: Synergies in Anti-Corruption & Human Rights Compliance

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Guidelines, Report

Connecting the anti-corruption and human rights agendas: A guide for business and employers’ organisations

2020 | Business at OECD (BIAC); International Organisation of Employers (IOE)

Book

Anti-Corruption Compliance: A Guide for Small and Mid-Sized Organizations

2020 | Edward Elgar Publishing

Gemma Aiolfi

Article

Perspectives 3: Asset recovery and wildlife trafficking

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance; The International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators

Gretta Fenner

Article

Perspectives 1: Impacts of illegal wildlife trade on business

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance; The International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators

Tim Wittig

Article

Perspectives 2: The role of public-private partnerships in combating illegal wildlife trade

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance; The International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators

Juhani Grossmann

Annual report

Annual Report 2019

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance