Basel Institute on Governance

Learning Review: Transparency International's Integrity Pacts for Public Procurement

This Learning Review was the first comprehensive analysis of experiences with Integrity Pact implementation in over 20 countries over two decades.

The main findings confirm that Integrity Pacts:

  • Bring value as a corruption prevention mechanism in procurement, particularly in specific procurement processes;
  • Do not contribute to delays or add significant costs to procurement; but rather
  • Promote a level playing field among private sector competitors; and
  • Can contribute to cost savings and increased trust in public procurement.

It identifies the following key factors that contribute to an Integrity Pact’s success:

  • Political will of the contracting authority to use the Integrity Pact to its full extent to reduce corruption;

  • Maximum transparency at every step;

  • External independent monitoring to verify that Integrity Pact obligations are fulfilled;

  • Monitors with expertise in the relevant industry and anti-corruption compliance and integrity;

  • Including the monitor from the design phase of a tender through contract execution;

  • Effective communication channels between the monitor(s) and all parties to an Integrity Pact;

  • Defining a clear process for identification, reporting and escalation of potential integrity issues through dispute resolution or sanctions from the outset.

Finally, it offers additional recommendations to improve the management and effectiveness of Integrity Pacts:

  • Tenders that apply Integrity Pacts should benefit from a thorough needs assessment and analysis of contextual corruption risks. This can set the baseline for an increased focus on data collection and monitoring and evaluation of the impact and benefits of using an Integrity Pact to monitor procurement.
  • Lessons learned from a one-off use of an Integrity Pact in a tender should be seized to promote systemic improvements and reforms to public procurement in each context.
  • Best practice sharing and on individual experiences with Integrity Pacts among anti-corruption and procurement experts should be enhanced.

The report applied a rigorous research methodology, canvassing nine review questions and gathering evidence from Integrity Pact practitioners and stakeholders through extensive desk research of relevant materials, a survey, interviews, and two on-site missions (in Mexico and India).

Learn more about Integrity Pacts on the Basel Institute’s 2020 Integrity Pact resource site. Drawing on the 2015 Learning Review and new research and analysis, the online resource site aims to promote greater awareness and exchange of experiences for all stakeholders interested in implementing Integrity Pacts to monitor and improve public procurement.

Published

01/2015 (12 years ago)

Author

Blomeyer and Sanz

Document

Related publications

Guidelines, Report

Engaging the private sector in Collective Action against corruption: A practical guide for anti-corruption agencies in Africa

2024 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch, Liza Young

Guidelines

Handbook of good practices in the fight against corruption

2023 | European Commission, Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs

Guidelines

Engaging the private sector in Collective Action against corruption

2022 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
Corruption prevention

Guidelines

Integrity pacts in the EU: Suitability, set up, and implementation

2022 | Transparency International

Rafael García Aceves

Guidelines, Report

Safeguarding EU-funded investments with Integrity Pacts: a decision-maker’s guide to collaborative public contracting

2021 | Transparency International

Rafael García Aceves
Public financial management

Article, Report

The G20’s responsiveness to B20 anti-corruption recommendations 2010–2017. Part I: Baseline report

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
Anti-corruption

Report

Mainstreaming Collective Action: Establishing a baseline

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Gemma Aiolfi, Kyle Forness, Monica Guy
Anti-corruption

Guidelines

G20 Compendium of Good Practices for Promoting Integrity and Transparency in Infrastructure Development

2019 | G20

Article

Integrity Pacts: A Contractual Approach to Facilitate Civic Monitoring of Public Procurement

2018 | The Global Anticorruption Blog

Article

Integrity Pacts to Prevent Corruption in Banknote Procurement

2018 | Currency News

Mirna Adjami
Collective ActionBusiness integrity

Guidelines

Model Monitoring Agreement and Integrity Pact for Infrastructure: An implementation guide for civil society organisations

2018 |

Transparency International

Guidelines

Integrity Pact training: guidance for trainers

2017 | Water Integrity Network & Transparency International

Guidelines

The case for Integrity Pacts: Engaging civil society for better public procurement outcomes

2017 |

Transparency International

Guidelines

The Business Case for Integrity Pacts: How Civil Society Monitoring Benefits You

2017 |

Transparency International
Collective Action

Guidelines

Making the Case for Open Contracting in Healthcare Procurement

2017 |

Transparency International

Report

Political influence in public procurement: balancing between legality and illegality

2017 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Mike Beke

Article

Countering Procurement Corruption with Integrity Pacts: The Indian Experience

2016 | The Global Anticorruption Blog

Report

Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement

2016 |

OECD

Guidelines

The Case for Integrity Pacts: Engaging Civil Society for Better Public Procurement Outcomes

2016 |

Transparency International
Collective Action

Guidelines

Integrity Pacts: A How-To Guide from Practitioners

2016 | Transparency International

Transparency International
Collective Action