University of Gothenburg

Why pay bribes? Collective Action and anti-corruption efforts

This paper suggests that the effectiveness of current anticorruption policy suffers from a focus on the scale of the corruption problem instead of type of corruption that is to be fought. I make a distinction between need and greed corruption. Contrary to the most commonly used distinctions this distinction focuses on the basic motivation for paying a bribe, and whether the bribe is used to gain services that citizens are legally entitled to or not.

Greed corruption is used to gain advantages that citizens are not legally entitled to, build on collusion rather than extortion and can thereby remain invisible and unobtrusive. In greed corruption societies the costs of corruption are divided between a large number of actors and the negative effects of corruption on economic and demo- cratic performance are delayed and diffuse. I subsequently use this distinction to develop three propositions about the relationship between corruption and institutional trust, and the effects of anticorruption policy. Using both cross country data and a case study of a low corruption context, I suggest

  • That greed corruption can coexist with high institutional trust, and that it thereby may not follow the expected, and often confirmed, negative relationship between corruption and institutional trust;
  • b) That greed corruption may not produce civic engagement against corruption;
  • c) That increased transparency may not produce the expected benefits in low need corruption con- texts, since it can disproportionally alter expectations about the entrenchment of corruption in a society.

In other words, the paper suggest that the balance between need and greed corruption in a society determines the effectiveness of traditional policy measures derived from the logic of principal agent theory, such as societal accountability and transparency, and that the relevance of collective action theory to understand the effects of anticorruption efforts can be extended to contexts where the overall level of corruption is low.

Published

01/2011 (16 years ago)

Authors

Monika Bauhr
Naghmeh Nasiritousi

Document

Related publications

Policy Brief, Report

Policy Briefing: Local Governance and Service Delivery

null | Good Governance Africa

Public governance

Policy Brief, Report

Policy Discussion Paper for the Enhancing Accountability Programme – Technical Assistance Facility

null | Good Governance Africa

Anti-corruptionBusiness integrityEthicsCompliance

Report

The role of PPPs in South Africa’s water sector

null | Good Governance Africa

Governance

Report, Guidelines

Ethics companion for Legal and Regulatory Functions

null | The Ethics Institute

Business integrityEthicsCompliance

Report

Anti‑Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2026

null | OECD

Anti-corruptionBusiness integrityPublic governance

Guidelines, Report

An Anti-Corruption Ethics and Compliance Programme for Business: A Practical Guide

null | United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; United Nations Global Compact

Anti-corruptionEthicsBusiness integrityCompliance

Report

Corruption Perceptions Index 2025

null | Transparency International

Public governanceCorruption

Report

2026 Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report

null | Edelman Trust Institute

Working Paper

Working Paper 60: Understanding the enemy: Insights from corrupt networks to improve anti-corruption Collective Action initiatives

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Dr Claudia Baez Camargo, Dr Jacopo Costa
Collective ActionAnti-corruptionInformalityOrganised crime

Report

King V Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2025

null | The Institute of Directors in South Africa

EthicsGovernanceBusiness integrity

Report

Berlin Process: post-event summary report

null | Regional Anti-Corruption Initiative

Collective Action

Report

Strengthening security sector governance in fragile jurisdictions

null | Good Governance Africa

Business integrityDefence and securityGovernance

Report, Guidelines

B20 South Africa 2025 Integrity and Compliance Task Force Paper

null | B20 South Africa

Business integrityCompliance

Report

Anti-corruption Collective Action in the G20/B20 process: Charting progress 2020–2024

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
Anti-corruptionCollective Action

Book

Collective Action in practice: a game-changer for business integrity

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Vanessa Hans, Nicolas Hocq
Anti-corruptionComplianceCollective ActionBusiness integrity

Report

Advancing business integrity through collective action

2025 |

OECD
Collective ActionBusiness integrity

Working Paper

Working Paper 57: Mapping and strengthening the evidence base for anti-corruption Collective Action

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Lucie Jones, Joseph Pozsgai-Alvarez, Giovanna Rodriguez-Garcia

Report

15 years of Anti-Corruption Collective Action: Stories of Integrity from the Private Sector

2025 | United Nations Global Compact

Working Paper

Working Paper 56: Anti-corruption Collective Action: A typology for a new era

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
Collective ActionAnti-corruption

Quick Guide

Quick Guide 39: Business integrity and ethics

2025 | Basel Institute on Governance

Vanessa Hans, Monica Guy
Business integrityEthicsSustainabilityCorruption risks