OECD

Anti-corruption Reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Progress and Challenges, 2016-2019

Corruption remains high in the region of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Governments have undertaken many reforms to tackle corruption. However, empirical data and perception surveys show a poor enforcement track record and that countries have not fully aligned their laws with the international standards. This report takes stock of the actions that countries in the region took to address corruption since 2016. It identifies progress achieved as well as remaining challenges that require further action by countries.

The report summarises outcomes of the fourth round of Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan monitoring that covered nine countries in the region: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. The Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan is an initiative of the OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ACN).

The report analyses three broad areas of anti-corruption work, including anti-corruption policies and institutions, criminalisation of corruption and law-enforcement, and measures to prevent corruption in public administration and in the private sector. Examples of good practice from the OECD and other countries and comparative cross-country data help to illustrate the analysis. The report also reviews the role that the OECD/ACN played in supporting anticorruption efforts in the region.

Published

09/2020 (2 years ago)

Countries

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Mongolia
Tajikistan
Ukraine
Uzbekistan

Related publications

Guidelines

Engaging the private sector in Collective Action against corruption

2022 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
corruption prevention

Article, Commissioned study, Report

The G20’s responsiveness to B20 anti-corruption recommendations 2010–2017. Part I: Baseline report

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Scarlet Wannenwetsch
anti-corruption standards

Report

Anti-corruption Reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Progress and Challenges, 2016-2019

2020 | OECD

Commissioned study, Report

Tackling Bribe Solicitation Using the High-Level Reporting Mechanism for Preventing Bribery

2020 | OECD

Report

Mainstreaming Collective Action: Establishing a baseline

2020 | Basel Institute on Governance

Gemma Aiolfi, Kyle Forness, Monica Guy
anti-corruption complianceanti-corruption strategiesanti-corruption standardsadvocacy

Report

Roundtable on the pilot High Level Reporting Mechanism in Argentina

2018 | Basel Institute on Governance

Mirna Adjami, Erica Pedruzzi
High Level Reporting MechanismArgentine National Roads Authoritypublic procurementHLRM

Working paper

Working Paper 25: High Level Reporting Mechanisms: A comparative analysis

2018 | Basel Institute on Governance

Valeria Silva, Gemma Aiolfi
High Level Reporting MechanismHLRMpublic procurementanti-bribery measures

Article

The High Level Reporting Mechanism (HLRM) – A tool to help prevent bribery and related practices

2017 | OECD, Basel Institute on Governance

Working paper

Working Paper 19: High Level Reporting Mechanisms in Colombia and Ukraine

2015 | Basel Institute on Governance

Frédéric Wehrle
HLRMHigh Level Reporting Mechanismanti-bribery measurespublic procurementanti-bribery laws

Guidelines

Designing a High Level Reporting Mechanism for Business - A Guidance Note for Governments

2015 | Basel Institute on Governance

Gemma Aiolfi, Nicola Bonucci
HLRMHigh Level Reporting MechanismOECDTransparency Internationalanti-bribery measures

Article

Impact Story: The High Level Reporting Mechanism

2014 | Basel Institute on Governance

Gemma Aiolfi
High Level Reporting Mechanism